Find out how the U.S. Supreme Court's recent rulings on former presidents' immunity and social media laws are making waves in the legal world!
In a groundbreaking 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court decided on the immunity of former presidents, particularly addressing Donald Trump's case. The justices sent Trump's case back to the trial court, sparking debates on the extent of presidential immunity. President Joe Biden criticized the decision, disagreeing with the concept of absolute immunity for ex-presidents. Additionally, the Court's decision on social media laws in Texas and Florida highlights the ongoing legal battles surrounding online platforms.
The Supreme Court's ruling on Trump's immunity for official acts has far-reaching implications for future presidential accountability. By granting immunity for core acts, the Court effectively shields presidents from certain legal consequences. The conservative bloc's influence in recent decisions, along with the overturning of long-standing precedents like Chevron deference, showcases the evolving landscape of the judiciary. This shift could have profound effects on the balance of power within the branches of government.
In another notable development, the Court's decision to delay Trump's trial and its impact on the 2020 election interference case underscores the intersection of legal proceedings and political dynamics. The broader implications of this ruling on the presidency's authority and accountability are still being debated. Overall, the Supreme Court's recent decisions on immunity and social media laws have ignited discussions on the limits of presidential power and the ever-evolving legal landscape in the digital age.
In a historic 6-3 ruling, the justices returned Trump's case to the trial court to determine what is left of special counsel Jack Smith's indictment of ...
U.S. President Joe Biden rebuked the Supreme Court justices who ruled former presidents have absolute immunity from prosecution for their official acts, saying ...
The U.S. Supreme Court found on Monday that Donald Trump cannot be prosecuted for any actions that were within his constitutional powers as president, ...
With its immunity ruling on Monday, the Supreme Court granted former President Donald Trump's wish of all but guaranteeing that his criminal trial for ...
The justices, voting 6-3 along ideological lines, said a federal appeals court was too categorical in rejecting Trump's immunity arguments, ruling for the first ...
Court rules former presidents entitled to some degree of immunity from criminal prosecution.
The decision likely ensures that the case against Trump won't be tried before the election, and then only if he is not reelected.
The justices unanimously agreed to return the Texas and Florida cases Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton to lower courts for analysis, but in doing so, ...
Opinion. Supreme Court conservatives sure have a funny way of voting as a 'bloc'. The decision about Biden administration influence on social media platforms ...
The Supreme Court last week overturned a 40 year precedent. In a case brought by New England fisherman, the court reversed the Chevron deference.
In dissent to the court's 6-3 decision, liberal judges warn: 'The president is now a king above the law'. Alexander Panetta · CBC News · Posted: Jul 01, ...
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett and Sonia Sotomayor joined Kagan's opinion, while Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson ...
The Supreme Court's ruling in former President Donald Trump's 2020 election interference case makes it all but certain that the Republican will not face ...
On Monday, the US top court weighed the broad claims former President Donald Trump made that his actions, while in office, were immune from prosecution. He ...
In a strikingly political speech from the White House, President Joe Biden blasted the Supreme Court ruling that granted broad presidential immunity, ...
The US Supreme Court has said Donald Trump and other former presidents are partially immune from criminal prosecution, in a major legal victory for the ...
The Supreme Court of the United States (Supreme Court) just handed down three blockbuster rulings and granted certiorari in a third case to be argued next ...
On June 20, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a longstanding legal precedent that required federal courts to defer to reasonable agency interpretation ...
Attorneys and agency officials warn of chaos and restricted agency power after high court constrains executive branch power.
Former President Trump is trying to overturn his recent felony conviction in the New York "hush money" criminal case.
By shifting regulatory power away from government agencies and to the courts, recent SCOTUS rulings may be a boon for a tech industry under fire.
Clearly President Biden had a bad debate night. But the Supreme Court gave him a possible way out.
President Joe Biden offered a dramatic, direct response to an epochal Supreme Court ruling that could hand presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump a ...
The US Supreme Court ruled on Monday (1 July) that Donald Trump cannot be prosecuted for actions that were within his constitutional powers as president, ...
In speech from White House, president said ruling 'undermined the rule of law' and compared their characters.
Plus, transgender runner Nikki Hiltz has set a trial record and punched a ticket to the Olympics.
Special counsel Jack Smith and Judge Tanya Chutkan have a narrow path to move forward with a trial.
(Bloomberg) -- The Supreme Court's decision declaring Donald Trump partially immune from prosecution for efforts to overturn the 2020 election avoided ...
Dissenting Justice Sotomayor warns of 'nightmare' scenarios after Trump ruling that grants presidential, presumptive immunity. Former President Donald Trump ...
The Supreme Court's ruling that Donald Trump is presumptively immune from criminal prosecution for official acts is likely to have a ripple effect.
After the justices struck down a 40-year precedent last week, experts warn of chaos for higher education amid doubts about the future of Title IX and ...
But the text of Ford's pardon made clear that but for the pardon, Nixon might have faced criminal prosecution for his conduct while president. Ford wrote in his ...
Joe Biden denounced the 6-3 ruling, saying it 'undermined the rule of law' and was a 'terrible disservice to the people of this nation.
Last week the Supreme Court struck a momentous blow for the Constitution and individual liberty when it overturned a dreadful decision it made in 1984.
In a shocking and lawless opinion, the Supreme Court granted presidents broad protections from criminal prosecution for “official acts” they undertake while ...
FERC Chairman Willie Phillips defended the commission's transmission planning rule after the court eliminated the Chevron deference for federal agencies.
With today's Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, that fundamentally changed. For all — for all practical purposes, today's decision almost ...
Just a few weeks ago, a Manhattan jury found former president Donald Trump guilty of 34 felony counts. Its decision affirmed an idea that is the bedrock of ...