Olaplex hair loss lawsuit

One of the top-selling haircare brands in the United States, Olaplex, is facing a legal hurdle as a federal lawsuit seeking at least $75000 in damages was ...

Over ten products from the haircare brand seem to have caused serious damage to the hair of people who have used them. The brand's haircare products are widely available in cosmetic chains and online markets. The lawsuit revolves around Olaplex hair treatment products starting from No. The 61-page lawsuit filed against the makers mentions a wide range of hair care products ranging from No. The hair has split and broken, causing it to look unkept." The makers of the hair treatment range Olaplex Holdings and Cosway Co., Inc.

Consumers say a popular hair care product damaged their locks and sometimes caused hair loss.

Lilial is banned from hair and beauty products in Europe. If a product passes the test, that means it did not cause sensitivity in or inflame the skin or hair follicle, which is what causes hair loss. Olaplex hair products went through human repeat insult patch tests (HRIPT), a standard evaluation for personal care products that tests for irritation and sensitization.

Olaplex, a beauty brand favored by TikTok and Instagram influencers, sells hair products that dozens of customers allege caused “serious injury,” according ...

“There are a wide variety of reasons for hair breakage or hair loss, as medical and scientific experts have publicly stated, including lifestyle, various medical conditions and medications, the aftereffects of Covid, skin conditions and more.” Olaplex, a beauty brand favored by TikTok and Instagram influencers, sells hair products that dozens of customers allege caused “serious injury,” according to a lawsuit filed last week. Nearly 30 women joined together to file a lawsuit against Olaplex on February 9, specifically targeting its No.

Olaplex has been named in a lawsuit after multiple users claim the fan favorite hair care products left them with bald spots, blisters and more.

The lawsuit claims that women who used the products were left with 'dry, brittle, frizzy and dull' hair.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in California on Feb. 9, claims that the women used Olaplex to help protect and restore their hair, but that it only caused ...

It’s a symbol of our youth, a symbol of our health, it’s a symbol of our sexuality and our personality and beauty … “(Companies) do not make changes unless they’re forced to and they’re only forced to when it hits their wallet.” “Of course no one is going to have a response.” “We are prepared to vigorously defend our company, our brand, and our products against these baseless accusations.” “We have publicly released test results from independent third-party laboratories, going above and beyond industry standards, to demonstrate this,” the statement said. [](https://nnn.ng/#:~:text=smart blogger outreach)

The lawsuit claims that women who used the products were left with 'dry, brittle, frizzy and dull' hair.

The brand has also specified on [its health page](http://go.redirectingat.com/?id=44681X1458326&url=https%3A%2F%2Folaplex.com%2Fpages%2Fhair-health&sref=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/olaplex-lawsuit-haircare-injuries-b2283077.html) that their products have been “tested” and “do not cause hair loss or hair breakage”. It is not an active or functional ingredient,” the company said in a statement to The Independent. “We have full confidence and believe in the safety and efficacy of our products,” the statement read. Since January 2022, Olaplex no longer sold products using lilial in the UK or EU.” This decision came in response to the European Union placing a ban on the ingredient in March 2022. I started to feel the wind and air on my scalp in places that I’ve never felt it.” “While this phase out is limited to the EU, out of an abundance of caution, Olaplex proactively removed lillial from our No.3 Hair Perfector globally. “At Olaplex, lilial was previously used in small amounts as a fragrance in No. In a statement to The Independent, Olaplex denied the claims made in the lawsuit and says its “products are safe and effective, as millions of our customers can happily attest”. The company also responded to Auriana’s complaint and said that it’s “a fact of life in [their] industry”. [Olaplex notes](http://go.redirectingat.com/?id=44681X1458326&url=https%3A%2F%2Folaplex.com%2Fcollections%2Fall-products&sref=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/olaplex-lawsuit-haircare-injuries-b2283077.html) that it offers “building treatment products that will repair, strengthen and leave hair healthier”. “I think by that point I had probably lost 20 per cent of my hair,” Auriana said.