The union is seeking nearly $6 million it alleges was unlawfully transferred to the three, as well as millions more in damages.
“I want to be clear to you, our staff and members, and the people of Ontario who we dutifully serve, that we will not waiver in our commitment to seeking justice in this matter, and we have the full support of the Board to pursue all available legal avenues,” Hornick wrote. OPSEU says since Thomas and Almeida left their positions last April, the union has been doing a forensic audit and alleges it has uncovered that Thomas and Almeida paid themselves “significant compensation” they weren’t entitled to, used union money for non-business purposes, transferred union vehicles to themselves or family members and paid out strike fund cash to themselves and Gabay. The union is seeking nearly $6 million it alleges was unlawfully transferred to former president Warren (Smokey) Thomas, former first vice-president/treasurer Eduardo Almeida and former financial services administrator Maurice Gabay, as well as millions more in damages.
The Ontario Public Service Employees Union is suing three former executives for more than $6 million, alleging they enriched themselves unjustly using the ...
"They have to prove the damages they're seeking in front of a court. "We will continue to act and work collaboratively with the appropriate authorities. "This information has been crucial in helping us make the right decisions about what steps to take next, and most importantly how we stop this from ever happening again. The statement of claim follows a forensic audit into the union's finances after a new board was elected in April, she said. The amounts totalled $399,472 for Thomas and $281,275 for Almeida from 2017 to 2022, totals to which they were not entitled, according to the union. Thomas retired in April 2022, while Almeida resigned in July of the same year.
Lawsuit filed by Ontario Public Service Employees Union accuses Warren (Smokey) Thomas and two other executives of transferring millions in cash and assets ...
Mr. Thomas, Mr. Almeida and Mr. Thomas and Mr. “Mr. Allegations against Mr. Both Mr. Thomas also allegedly transferred a number of vehicles purchased by the union to himself and his family. “I want to assure you that despite today’s news, our union remains strong and our finances stable. By this point, Mr. Thomas owes $1.75-million; and Mr. The lawsuit claims that Mr.
Ontario union claims the men 'unlawfully transferred' millions of dollars, gave union cars to family members.
No supporting documentation was provided to support the withdrawals or to explain their purpose,” the statement of claim says. “OPSEU/SEFPO is entitled to aggravated and/or punitive damages as a result of their deliberate and unlawful conduct.” The statement of claim says that when Thomas retired, his severance payout was $61,903 and that the union did not make any such payout to Almeida. “OPSEU/SEFPO is not aware of any legitimate strike or lockout-related purpose behind withdrawing such significant sums of cash, and indeed there was none. [allegations](https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2022/07/23/new-details-of-alleged-rapid-test-transaction-emerge-as-full-report-on-jerry-dias-investigation-is-released.html) that former Unifor president [ Jerry Dias ](https://www.thestar.com/news/investigations/2022/07/20/wads-of-cash-relentless-pressure-infighting-at-unifor-leaked-investigation-findings-reveal-new-details-of-jerry-dias-scandal.html)was involved in a kickback scandal and then attempted to obstruct a probe into his conduct. They abused the power and authority that the union’s membership bestowed upon them and violated the trust that the union’s membership placed in them year after year, election after election.” A third-party workplace investigation alleged that Dias, who retired last year, [received $50,000 from a COVID-19 rapid test supplier ](https://www.thestar.com/news/investigations/2022/07/20/wads-of-cash-relentless-pressure-infighting-at-unifor-leaked-investigation-findings-reveal-new-details-of-jerry-dias-scandal.html)he promoted to employers. “The union’s executive board and its general membership trusted and relied on Thomas and Almeida to protect the union, including to ensure that members’ hard-earned union dues were used in the best interests of the union and its members,” the statement of claim says. I want to assure you that despite today’s news our union remains strong and our finances stable.” “These compensation payments were not known to or authorized by the executive board at the time,” the statement of claim says, adding that “Gabay, who was charged with oversight of payroll and compensation, breached his employment duties to OPSEU/SEFPO by conspiring or colluding with Thomas and Almeida, and/or permitting these unauthorized payments to be made to them.” Gabay has received $118,456 in “post-termination payments” from the union — which it is now seeking to recover “in light of the misconduct that has been discovered to date,” the statement of claim says. The statement of claim says money — in amounts ranging from $10,000 to $70,000 from 2014 to 2020 — was withdrawn for the union strike fund and allegedly used for “undocumented and illegitimate purposes.”
OPSEU Suing Former Leaders for Millions: Allegations of Misuse of Strike Fund, Unsanctioned Compensation, and Union Vehicles.
The allegations have not been proven in court and no statement of defence has been filed yet. The union is also asking for “aggravated and/or punitive damages in the amount of $500,000 as against each of Thomas, Almeida and Gabay,” the statement of claim says. The allegations against them are detailed in a statement of claim filed in Ontario’s Superior Court on Monday morning.
Three former executives are the target of a lawsuit by the Ontario Public Service Employees' Union that claims they engaged in financial wrongdoing. The.
I want to make this clear to you, our employees and members, and the people of Ontario whom we tirelessly serve. OPSEU claims that since Thomas and Almeida left their jobs in April of last year, the union has been conducting a forensic audit. The claims have not been put to the test in court.