Politico

Chief Justice John Roberts confirmed the authenticity of the leaked Supreme Court draft document on the end of Roe v. Wade, but said it did not represent ...

Wade — and published a leaked draft of that majority opinion, written by Samuel Alito. Wade into law, saying, “it will fall on our nation’s elected officials at all levels of government to protect a woman’s right to choose.” The Supreme Court is prepared to overturn Roe v. Leaked document shows Supreme Court prepared to overturn Roe v. Wade, but said it did not represent the court's final decision. Chief Justice John Roberts confirmed the authenticity of the leaked Supreme Court draft document on the end of Roe v.

In a stunning breach of Supreme Court confidentiality and secrecy, Politico has obtained what it calls a draft of a majority opinion written by Justice ...

The court said that a regulation cannot place an "undue burden" on the right to abortion, which is defined as a "substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus attains viability." In the opinion, Alito also addresses the fact that Roe has been on the books for some 50 years. Casey. A majority of the court in that case replaced Roe's framework with a new standard to determine the validity of laws restricting abortions. Abortion is your right -- and it is STILL LEGAL," Planned Parenthood said in a tweet Under normal procedure, by the end of that week the justices would have met in their private conference to take a preliminary vote on the issue. At oral arguments, Roberts was the only one of the six Republican appointees who signaled interest in exploring a narrower opinion that would have upheld Mississippi's law but preserved some protections for abortion rights. "The Constitution makes no reference to abortion and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision," Alito wrote. In the past, justices have changed their votes and sometimes a majority opinion ultimately becomes a dissent. The opinion would be the most consequential abortion decision in decades and transform the landscape of women's reproductive health in America. Roberts is willing, however, to uphold the Mississippi law that would ban abortion at 15 weeks of pregnancy, CNN has learned. Politico's publishing of the draft is unprecedented by the high court's standards of secrecy. The opinion in this case is not expected to be published until late June.

"We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft circulated inside the court.

The conservative justice attached to his draft a 31-page appendix listing laws passed to criminalize abortion during that period. Some of these authors clearly had access to draft opinions such as the one obtained by POLITICO, but their books emerged well after the cases in question were resolved. United States, and the 1896 decision that blessed racial segregation under the rubric of “separate but equal,” Plessy v. The phrase was also contained in an opinion Kavanaugh wrote as part of a 2020 ruling that jury convictions in criminal cases must be unanimous. The draft is often amended in consultation with other justices, and in some cases the justices change their votes altogether, creating the possibility that the current alignment on Dobbs v. Under longstanding court procedures, justices hold preliminary votes on cases shortly after argument and assign a member of the majority to write a draft of the court’s opinion. Alito approvingly quotes a broad range of critics of the Roe decision. If the Alito draft is adopted, it would rule in favor of Mississippi in the closely watched case over that state’s attempt to ban most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The draft opinion offers an extraordinary window into the justices’ deliberations in one of the most consequential cases before the court in the last five decades. No draft decision in the modern history of the court has been disclosed publicly while a case was still pending. The draft opinion is a full-throated, unflinching repudiation of the 1973 decision which guaranteed federal constitutional protections of abortion rights and a subsequent 1992 decision – Planned Parenthood v. Wade decision, according to an initial draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito circulated inside the court and obtained by POLITICO.

A draft opinion suggests the U.S. Supreme Court could be poised to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade case that legalized abortion nationwide, ...

Some big-name directors are putting their stamp on the Met's spring Costume Institute exhibit that will be launched with at the Met Gala and opening to the public on May 7. As pandemic restrictions are lifted and case numbers ease, some companies want workers back in the office five days a week. But after a journey of more than 1,100 kilometres , the thieves were unable to use any of the equipment -- because it had been locked remotely. Wade case that legalized abortion nationwide, according to a Politico report released Monday. Wade case that legalized abortion nationwide, according to a Politico report released Monday. It's impossible to know what efforts are taking place behind the scenes to influence any justice's vote. Alito, in the draft, said the court can't predict how the public might react and shouldn't try. The leak jumpstarted the intense political reverberations that the high court’s ultimate decision was expected to have in the midterm election year. The report comes amid a legislative push to restrict abortion in several Republican-led states — Oklahoma being the most recent — even before the court issues its decision. “Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” the draft opinion states. A decision to overrule Roe would lead to abortion bans in roughly half the states and could have huge ramifications for this year's elections. Wade case that legalized abortion nationwide, according to a Politico report released Monday.

By the time of the brunch, Politico was working on a story about a leaked draft opinion from the Supreme Court that would strike down Roe v. Wade, according to ...

Founded in 2007, Politico was among a crop of media upstarts that redefined news for the digital era. The article said that the document was provided by “a person familiar with the court’s proceedings,” and that the person had provided additional details that helped authenticate the document, but it didn’t say what those details were. Wade and the direction of the court front and center in the nation’s political debate. By the time of the brunch, Politico was working on a story about a leaked draft opinion from the Supreme Court that would strike down Roe v. “This unprecedented view into the justices’ deliberations is plainly news of great public interest.” Employees were also advised to consider the privacy settings on their social media accounts to avoid potential online harassment. News organizations around the world, including The New York Times and The Associated Press, quickly followed Politico’s reporting. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court confirmed that the draft opinion was authentic. It is extremely rare for an important draft opinion inside the Supreme Court to leak to the press. The Supreme Court’s upcoming decision in Dobbs v. Wadesuggests an internal disarrayat odds with the decorum prized by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. Wade, according to two people with knowledge of the process inside the newsroom.

BERLIN — German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier has had no contact with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy since being declared unwelcome in ...

Against this backdrop, officials in Berlin told POLITICO that a request from Steinmeier to speak with Zelenskyy via phone has been “pending” for more than three weeks. The officials said the phone call request “is still outstanding” and has so far been left unanswered by Zelenskyy’s office. Scholz indicated that Steinmeier — who officially holds the highest office in Germany, even though his role is largely ceremonial — must first be able to meet Zelenskyy before he can go.

For decades, activists across the political spectrum have believed that Supreme Court justices are pretenders — ideologues and partisan hacks who try to ...

Alito declares that none of the arguments in his ruling will affect current law on the right to marry or contraception. But there’s nothing to stop the nationalization of the debate at the congressional level — outlawing abortion everywhere if Republicans chose to do so with a narrow majority next time they take control of Congress, or the opposite when Democrats are in charge. These brawling instincts were apparently compelling — at least in the privacy of Supreme Court chambers — to four colleagues who voted with him: Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. It’s worth remembering that a draft opinion is a draft: Some of these people may, upon consideration, decide that they would rather try to keep juggling on abortion for a while. Historically, many abortion rights supporters have believed that putting that debate out in the open — and on the ballot — at a moment when the stakes are undeniably clear is a winning proposition for them. Instead of removing the issue from politics, a backlash to the court was the engine for a new conservative movement in the 1970s. Even people who have labored for decades to preserve a woman’s right to decide for herself whether to carry a pregnancy might agree there is something crisp and free of pretense about where a majority of the Supreme Court appears ready to go. Many passages sound less like a formal legal ruling than the argumentative tones of a relative who gets carried away at Thanksgiving — Do we have to talk politics over dinner? Compare this case, for instance, to the 2000 case of Bush v. Let’s stop pretending, he writes in bristling, vehement words that he plainly has been sharpening in his mind for decades, that intensely opposing views about the morality of abortion can or should be resolved by the courts. That’s where one of the most intimate dimensions of human life can be debated in a loud, thrashing, angry debate, right out in the open. But if the court follows through with its draft opinion — obtained by POLITICO and published Monday night — front and center is where it will be, even as polls consistently show majorities of 60 percent or more wish to leave the 1973 Roe v. On narrowly partisan grounds, not many Republican operatives would advise that the best strategy for the 2022 midterms and 2024 presidential elections is to put abortion rights front and center in a consuming national debate.

Other journalists haven't yet matched the blockbuster scoop that the Supreme Court's draft ruling on abortion would overturn Roe v. Wade.

But independent verification seems to have been impossible in the case of the Alito draft. But the Supreme Court story is by far the most consequential scoop Politico has landed in its 15 years. While Supreme Court leaks are extremely rare, there have been occasional stories that revealed details of the justices’ private deliberations. A spokesman for Politico, Brad Dayspring, declined to provide further details, except to say an “extremely small group” of staff members worked on the story. The news organization would not detail how it confirmed the document was authentic or when it first received it. Politico’s Monday night scoop that the Supreme Court has voted to overturn its 1973 Roe v.

Some in the crowd were frustrated at a perceived lack of action by Democrats in Congress and President Joe Biden. Senate Democrats will vote next week on ...

The U.S. Capitol Police closed roads around the Supreme Court and blocked the ends of the street with dump trucks as they prepared for demonstrations. “That’s what’s on the line.” “No one else.” “Where is Joe?” the crowd chanted at one point. Mathavi Sankar, a 26-year-old medical student at George Washington University, said: “This is actually just ridiculous. Demonstrations in the morning were relatively calm, though the crowd grew throughout the day.

Politico had obtained a draft opinion showing that the Supreme Court is poised to overturn the landmark 1973 abortion ruling in Roe v. Wade.

She added that the fact that the Supreme Court was ready to overturn Roe v. This decision is a direct assault on the dignity, rights and lives of women, not to mention decades of settled law. Maddow said, “The bottom line here is that this is, this would appear to be the day that, I mean, I was born in 1973, the year that Roe v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, court observers said that a majority of the justices appeared ready to water down or revise the Roe v. In my entire sentient life, women have been talking about the day that this would come, and that Roe v. Wade would be overturned and that the United States would become a country in which abortion was treated as a crime, and it was the government, was the state that is allowed to decide whether or not women give birth.” Shortly after the Politico story published, barricades went up on the steps of the court, and dozens if not hundreds of protesters began to arrive. “This means that there was a preliminary vote to fully overrule Roe v. “We take our responsibilities to our readers and our publication with the greatest seriousness. Josh Gerstein, who reported and wrote the Politico piece along with Alexander Ward, appeared on MSNBC’s The Rachel Maddow Show shortly after the story was posted, and expressed confidence in their sourcing. This unprecedented view into the justices’ deliberations is plainly news of great public interest.” Wade, giving states the power to ban abortion.